drbubb Posted April 29, 2015 Report Share Posted April 29, 2015 Good and Bad for BTL Here are some Ratings from the Global Property Guide Location ----- : Yield% : Rating-- : L.T. : Hong Kong---- : 2.82% : Very Poor : 2 Singapore----- : 2.83% : Very Poor : 2 UK, London----: 3.21% : Very Poor : 2 US, New York- : 3.91% : Very Poor : 3 Aust., Sydney- : 4.39% : Poor ------ : 2 Malaysia, K.L. : 4.57% : Poor ------ : 4 (Better) Japan, Tokyo- : 5.02% : Moderate-- : 2 Thail,Bangkok : 5.13% : Moderate-- : 4 New Z., Auckl. : 6.09% : ModtoGood: 4 Phil.,M.Manila : 7.51% : Good ------- : 3 Costa Rica, SJ: 8.38% : Excellent--- : 3 Panama,PCity : 8.99% : Excellent--- : 5 === > http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/investment-rating Question: What Locations are most heavily marketed in HK? There's a connection to the ratings, certainly! Why do you suppose that is? (Quick answer: think about the size of commissions) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted April 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2015 Here are some more Locations to look at Location------------- : Yield% : Rating------ : L.T. : Moldova, Chisinau : 10.00%: Spectacular : 3 Poland, Warsaw--- : 6.71% : Mod.toGood : 3 Spain, Madrid------ : 3.91% : Very Poor--- : 1 Portugal, Lisbon--- : 5.77% : Moderate--- : 2 === Moldova - because it got the only "spectacular" rating, and Poland-- - because it is about to borrow at Neg. Rates (in SFR), the first emerging market borrower to do so Spain--- - because I expected Yields to be higher Portugal - beats Spain, but still disappoints on yield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.