Jump to content

jsr

Members
  • Posts

    412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jsr

  1. DS. How significant is this news, fundamentally?
  2. Chart looking pretty good to me! Link to WSW presentation with Dr Seymour. He reckon's Human trials will begin early next year! http://wsw.com/webcast/marcum/register.aspx?conf=marcum&page=nnvc&url=http%3A//wsw.com/webcast/marcum/nnvc/ http://wsw.com/webca...st/marcum/nnvc/
  3. Allan's Trend Following Model ... Still looking good! http://www.allantrends.com/nnvc-6/
  4. Diwan brought another 147k yesterday, too. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1379006/000114036113010531/xslF345X03/doc1.xml
  5. Dr Diwan buy's 350,000 shares! http://secfilings.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?ID=9134036&SessionID=DOQeFUN3sQqcAPE
  6. Are we hammering out a bottom here? For the first time, I feel this stock has enough going on fundamentally to warrant a pretty significant run. I exchanged emails with Doctor Seymour recently. He expects Toxicology studies to begin in June. If successful, this will pave the way for Human clinical trials in Australia.
  7. http://www.zealllc.com/2011/goldseas6.htm Check the seasonality chart. Gold has followed the pattern almost day for day. According to the seasonal pattern, next week will be the low, although it won't be until November until $1800 is broken.
  8. Up over 25% today, and on big volume too. And nobody cares? What I think this signals ... Weak hands are flushed. Recent buyers are fresh buyers. A foundation for something much bigger.
  9. So it turns out orally administered FluCide works. Interesting. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/nanoviricides-reports-oral-administration-flucide-110000620.html
  10. Yes still about. Have not sold a share since I first brought in Oct' 09. DS, it looked impressive. Some serious buying started just before 2pm EST. I did think they owned the patents already (a sign of how little I understand this sector)? Can you shed some light please on how this affects the company going forward? P.s - I should think this has certainly flipped Allan's model LONG.
  11. Yes. All that would suggest tightening liquidity? Have you noticed VIX and Gold are becoming more positively correlated. All it may take is a pullback/correction in the main stock indices to kick start Gold. As for GS and MS ramping, I have no idea what to make of this!
  12. Question - Would you rather buy on fundamentals or chart and price action? The problem is, you can never really be sure when buying strictly on the fundamentals. Too many unknown, unknowns.
  13. POP! And we're off! Who's still in this thing?
  14. Very possible. I am surprised at the level of complacency. Has no one been watcing the TED spread? It's on a lazer beam rally! It does bring me some confort that the vast majority of parabolic moves are preceeded by large corrections that break the trend. This is probably the one.
  15. I do not know your holding period, but I am almost certain gold will go much lower, $1400's. Key supports have been smashed, so have MA's. A rally upto 1620, but no higher than 1680 is likely, but its down hard from there. We are nearly knocking at final support, I don't think I have seen a similazr pattern which has held. But let's not forget, that a parabolic move tends to be preceeded by a serious drop to flush out all bears. This is the one
  16. Your explanation makes sense to me. However, your chart shows CB bullion holdings remained largely flat from 75' to 80'? Surely they could not have been that big of buyers?
  17. Hey Goldfinger, can you explain exactly what MZM is, to a layman like myself?
  18. Ooo, we just got some action ... I hope I am wrong?
  19. DS, the way I see it, if we don't take off from these levels in the next couple weeks, we are in trouble. With these OTC stocks which no one trusts, and what seems like a never ending supply of short sellers who believe every other OTC is a fraud, anything can happen! Having said that, it held up well on today's statement.
  20. No, but I reckon a wash out of some sort.
  21. I've been reading across on ADVFN IHUB. That DrFeelgood fellow points out that the recent test was more or less a gram for gram comparision. He suggests, the subject will be able to tolerate much larger doses of HIVCide as it supposedly produces no tox side effects. Remember Oct' 09? I think that is what is in store if we are to shoot higher.
  22. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/NanoViricides-Reports-AntiHIV-bw-1241822342.html?x=0&.v=1 I seem to remember they claimed HIVCide was thousands of percent more effective than HAART. Now it's only equivalent? What gives?
  23. Dr Seymour expects the Pre-IND to be filed before the end of summer. But he say's ultimately, it's not up to him, it depends on the consulting firm.
  24. I'm using Zeal LLC's 10 year seasonal charts. http://www.zealllc.com/2010/goldseas5.htm
×
×
  • Create New...