Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • G0ldfinger

    2616

  • romans holiday

    2235

  • drbubb

    1478

  • Steve Netwriter

    1449

Fair enough, but I think your reasoning is faulty. We're over 1,000 for a while now, despite heavy cartel artillery trying to bomb the price down every day. That suggests a big buyer is always buying the dips. China has something like 500 billion toilet paper dollars to play with and they know that it is only a matter of time before the dollar game implodes. They are on an urgent timeline to get rid of their dollars for hard assets and businesses. China may well buy the IMF gold at 13 billion (IF the IMF allows them to) - that still leaves China with 487 billion to play with - that, IMHO, is why we won't see 900 as a basis level. China is buying the dips on an urgent basis with a virtually unlimited piggy bank, and other central banks are also accumulating gold on the QT. If there is a market crash and some big folks get margin calls, then yes there may be heavy selling of metals as happened the last time - only this time there are active buyers, and any big gold dip will soon be over and it will continue it's relentless gold bull.

I don't disagree, which is why I have a cash reserve...in order to buy silver on a possible dip. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if there is no dip? Surely logic dictates you buy now, before it goes up any more? When it is 30 heading to 50+ will you still be looking for an entry point?

If I did not already have around 70% of my liquid worth in gold and silver already, then yes I would be buying. However, I am satisfied with what I have now... and considering that if I bought more I would be 100% in metals, I will restrain myself for bargain basement prices.

 

If there is no dip and the bargain prices do not come, I would not have lost out much due to the large position I already have.... and besides metal I will still have cash in a relatively strong currency. I think before this bull market is over, we will see people panicking out of positions every which way. I want to be laid back and completely comfortable with my holding, and also be in a position to take advantage of any volatility or chaos in the market. Expect the unexpected.

 

From:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I did not already have around 70% of my liquid worth in gold and silver already, then yes I would be buying. However, I am satisfied with what I have now... and considering that if I bought more I would be 100% in metals, I will restrain myself for bargain basement prices.

 

I am similarly allocated.

 

If there is no dip and the bargain prices do not come, I would not have lost out much due to the large position I already have.... and besides metal I will still have cash in a relatively strong currency. I think before this bull market is over, we will see people panicking out of positions every which way. I want to be laid back and completely comfortable with my holding, and also be in a position to take advantage of any volatility or chaos in the market. Expect the unexpected.

 

Me too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did $100 gold in the 1970s prove strong resistance then strong support once breached? Looking at the charts it seems so, but I can't find a chart that covers that period in detail.

The chart below is detailed enough to see that breaching $100 was a picnic in the park when compared with the dance around $1,000. After $100 had been taken, it became ultimate support.

 

http://gold.approximity.com/since1968/Gold_USD_LOG.html

Gold_USD_LOG.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like you are planning on trading the volatility, in metals and in currencies. That is the path to ruin, IMHO. When the bank holiday comes, and it will, your 30 per cent will be in currency that you will NOT be able to touch - in toilet paper that will be decimated when (IF?) the banks open again, and you won't be able to do a thing about it. Sure, you will be covered by the other 70 per cent, but why throw away 30?

Well, I wouldn't say I am on the path to ruin given that I am already heavily invested in metals.

 

Considering that nothing goes up in a straight line, that you should always try to manage risk and stay hedged, and that there are no certainties in life [besides d and t of course] I feel quietly confident. Actually, I do not see how my approach is really that different to the "100% buy and hold on for dear life" approach.... just a little more nuanced :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I wouldn't say I am on the path to ruin given that I am already heavily invested in metals.

 

Considering that nothing goes up in a straight line, that you should always try to manage risk and stay hedged, and that there are no certainties in life [besides d and t of course] I feel quietly confident. Actually, I do not see how my approach is really that different to the "100% buy and hold on for dear life" approach.... just a little more nuanced :rolleyes:

I think the problem comes when you talk about the fact that there maybe a pull back as a certainty. I think that some of your comments may have helped to make unprotected people wait for a buying opportunity, when they should just average in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem comes when you talk about the fact that there maybe a pull back as a certainty. I think that some of your comments may have helped to make unprotected people wait for a buying opportunity, when they should just average in.

I have always said there are no certainties and that you should have a hedge. I have also consistently said that a cash hedge only makes sense within the context of a large bullion position [actually it is implicit in the meaning of the words]. Not very complicated stuff. I think the problem lies more in the fact that some have a dogmatic view that can not see beyond "fiat is toast.... full stop".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree completely.

 

Many folks much wiser than us are issuing immediate and repeated warnings that we are in black swan territory *right now* - Faber, Sinclair, High, Stiglitz (Nobel prize winner - read his recent statements), Greenspan (read his CODED recent statements), the Mogambo!, the IMF EVEN (talking about the sustainability of the USD), CGNAO's latest (I entirely agree) about contango/USD - Jim Wille, Bill Murphy, Adrian Ash and PLENTY more. Ignore all these canaries at your financial peril! :o

Ah yes, but the problem is there is another wise tribe giving an opposite prognosis. To make it even more confusing, each tribe calls the other foolish. :lol:

 

Those that subscribe to a tribe become dogmatic... I'd rather profess skepticism towards the dogmas on offer and take a more pragmatic approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree completely.

 

Many folks much wiser than us are issuing immediate and repeated warnings that we are in black swan territory *right now* - Faber, Sinclair, High, Stiglitz (Nobel prize winner - read his recent statements), Greenspan (read his CODED recent statements), the Mogambo!, the IMF EVEN (talking about the sustainability of the USD), CGNAO's latest (I entirely agree) about contango/USD - Jim Wille, Bill Murphy, Adrian Ash and PLENTY more. Ignore all these canaries at your financial peril! :o

 

At what stage will you reduce your PM holdings? And then what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At what stage will you reduce your PM holdings? And then what?

I will convert my gold and silver into a house and stocks, when I can see an end via the dow/gold ratio and house price/gold ratio.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not trading you are gambling. You are 'hoping' for a pull-back, that is not trading. You are gambling 30 per cent of your net worth that you get lucky. There is a huge chance that via currency debasement after a bank holiday your 30 per cent will become 3 per cent if a new debased currency is issued. It happened with the Euro. If the Amero is sprung on the USD, 100 old USDs will likely get you 10 Ameros. Had you had that 30 per cent in gold you would not have lost 27 per cent of your net worth in this scenario. There would have to be a new de facto gold standard and gold would be revalued against all currencies when the dust settles.

:blink:

Quite the opposite to gambling, my approach is conservative. I am hedging not gambling though I can see, by your hyper-inflationary logic, why you might think so. Personally, I do not think the dollar will hyper-inflate but devalue, by say 50%, and then only eventually.

 

Some would say you are gambling by having 100% in silver, but I couldn't possibly comment on that. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was waiting for you to say that! Bottom line is, volatility will get wild and crazy - if on margin you will sooner or later lose your shirt trying to second guess the market. If not on margin it will still happen, only more slowly. This is not my opinion, but the opinion of many metals experts that have been there/done that since the 60s on...

 

For sure, keep away from margin/ leverage etc! Neither a borrower nor lender be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not trading you are gambling. You are 'hoping' for a pull-back, that is not trading. You are gambling 30 per cent of your net worth that you get lucky. There is a huge chance that via currency debasement after a bank holiday your 30 per cent will become 3 per cent if a new debased currency is issued. It happened with the Euro. If the Amero is sprung on the USD, 100 old USDs will likely get you 10 Ameros. Had you had that 30 per cent in gold you would not have lost 27 per cent of your net worth in this scenario. There would have to be a new de facto gold standard and gold would be revalued against all currencies when the dust settles.

 

Realist Bear's old dollar:

 

http://i36.tinypic.com/123b0cx.jpg

 

123b0cx.jpg

 

edit - can't get the image to post. :(

 

I can - Steve :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:blink:

Quite the opposite to gambling, my approach is conservative. I am hedging not gambling though I can see, by your hyper-inflationary logic, why you might think so. Personally, I do not think the dollar will hyper-inflate but devalue, by say 50%, and then only eventually.

 

it's already done more than that just in this decade so far...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...