Jump to content

Beartrix

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Beartrix

  1. aliveandkicking said:
    Had a look at this.

    Bit confused. The article is talking about housing costs. But seems to be refering to cost of renting because it mentions land lords had no pricing power?

    Digging deeper from original source

    http://www.foothilltech.org/ceulau/honorsw...tionhandout.pdf

    costs begin at 10 food 5.5 housing 6 clothing and end at

    9.34 trillion food 38 billion housing and 5 trillion clothing for a low income family.

    Meanwhile land must have risen in price? Wages? Materials?

    This link also mentioned earlier refers to rent costs of low and middle class households but no obvious ownership costs.

    http://www.slideshare.net/ccarter333/weimar02web

    Other things being equal and of course they never, surely are a person beginning this period with a massive house and massive mortgage would be ending up with a massive house and almost zero mortgage?

     

    Exactly. The housing costs only refer to rent. I can see how during a period of hyperinflation the relative cost of housing to food would go down, however, the actual value would still go up considerably and provided you had a fix, you'd be quids in.

    A more interesting question is how did they then determine the value of land and property relative to incomes when the new currency was introduced?

×
×
  • Create New...