mansouryar

Sorry I didn't watch all that clip. I tried to download it at least 20 times, but I couldn't, so you have a vision of the internet situation in Iran. This is my reply anyway: Who cares what is in the newspapers? The level of freedom of speech is limited in many countries... (rest of comment deleted, at poster's request) ... There is no force to save the humans from themselves, only nature's reactions might affect the man; even I doubt this too …

Magnetism, ancient civilizations, cosmic order, etc are all exciting subjects to me, but I have no idea on that video. . Do you want to know the present situation about this fringe division of physics (wormholes ... etc)? My assessment: No private company dares to work on it sooner than its corresponding government. There is no definite justification for the governments to work on it sooner than the military. The military might do some efforts in secret which I naturally am unaware of them, so this is out of question. They both inspire from the mainstream science opinion and this branch is not credible enough for the academic people, at the best assumptions they think them as being too early. Therefore, the only remaining way is doing it by myself, and it takes long years to provide enough funding and facilities. . Maybe the new discovery of an earth-like planet would be a motivation for the nations of the world to come together to fund the construction of the needed spacecraft to go there, like the plot of Contact. I wonder what other kind of news could cause the public opinion to enforce making a FTL travelling machine (by their governments); despite the current economical conditions, I think the governments are able to fund such a project if they really wanted to; what else do they expect? The ETs send a message: We are living here, just bother yourself to spend some money to visit us?! Finding a habitable planet is not great enough? However I guess this hypothetical plan would waste much budget & time at the initial days, because I doubt the related decision makers would be clever enough to choose the wormhole mechanism as the first approach. They won't apply my spacewarp methods and let me in, because I don't have an academic degree. So I'd have to keep my own way, that story is none of my business. The lack of academic degree by quitting university has brought me a cool point: I've faced no negative obsession or pressure from the others yet, making me less serious (& dangerous) for others, and safer for myself. Anyway, it's not clear how much time do I need to keep dancing alone, before making a movement like this: Don't believe creating black holes in the lab as you pictured. The present science has no control over gravity. I mean by negating it; not by positive mass and clearly not by negative mass. All I said in this post about a dreamy international plan to make a wormhole is about one positive side of possibility of realizing the idea. The negative side of possibility of making a wormhole is to build it to use it as a weapon. I'd rather not talk about it, even not think about it … . P.S: Some of the comments of the news on the new found habitable planet were so funny. As I've mentioned in my facebook page, the Yahoo! News is one of my favorites.

Don't take the press so seriously, maybe I'm talking because of a depression, but no news is really interesting to me. Everything is just getting worse, failing to save the environment is a fundamental failure of modernism, and other breakthroughs, if one could call them so, seem very less important compared to that failure. If Iran could keep a connection to the outer world by internet at least, there is no such a thing as a curtain. The growing dictatorship, international sanctions and diminishing internet availability are completing that curtain pretty well; any time I post here, I consider it as my last post. Also, don't believe those stuffs about the secret projects in Iran, we have basic problems to refine our oil, we can't build good airplanes, so why should somebody think Iran is advanced? I know there is a tradition in west (& probably other places) to exaggerate about the rivals and enemies. I remember somewhere I read the most number of admirers of Napoleon Bonaparte among the historians are Britons, why? Because the British forces defeated him in the end! So by admiring Napoleon, they are giving credit to their own state success indeed. Another example, owing to hollow propaganda, many ones thought Saddam is too strong, but we observed he was too weak in fact and he was hanged like a loser at the end. Anyway, if one assumes there is a curtain between Iran and rest of the world, this curtain has plenty of holes and you can know about Iran from some channels. At least there is hope, as long as there is internet in Iran. I had liked to go to west when I was younger, but now I feel old and I'm becoming depressed and pessimistic, so I'm getting used to live behind this curtain. Probably it's from Dostoyevsky: "Human being has an incredible capability to get used to any misery". If millions of people are able to live in Iran, so can I. One more thing, I like the idea that ETs might be in here, but as you know about my general opinion, I don't wait for their actions and I plan to realize a propulsion to inspire theirs, if one assumes they are from other stellar systems. This is my life goal, even if it takes long years. * P.S.: Finding this link, listing a paper of mine, was cool to me: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/23857943/can-present-technology-create-gross-amounts-negative-energy-density It's being put in here for not forgetting it.

About Keshe, You said about him in the previous page and I replied you. How many times should I reply one subject? I see no science in Keshe's work, no theory, no experiment, no nothing. Again, I suggest reading this thread about Keshe: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread686588/pg1 The Above Top Secret members have some cool posts about his work. Most of Iranians have problem to accept each other's radical ideas, many people here consider it a certain fact that the first man-made flying saucer must be made in the U.S or a few other advanced countries, not in Iran and by Iranian individuals. Even if such a great achievement would be done in Iran, some insiders or Russian intelligence agents would know and would inform their fellow American partners about it, if the westerner intelligence agencies had not known it already. Iran is not a place that you can hide something big, as game changing as an actual flying saucer working based on gravity manipulation, for a long time from the foreigners. After all, I think his entire framework is fake, I doubt he has or had a serious contact with authorities about his work. If all he claims is true, I wonder why he is not being disappeared by the Iranian government or the west? Until I would watch a worldwide quake in the media about his work in reality, I'll keep ignoring him. About FTL neutrinos, I think those neutrino scientists have misused their position to show they're not wasting their life, to gain attention that they're awesome guys in terms of stupid pop culture by working on something FTL, and in result, they would receive more budget. That guardian article wants to relate the profound scientific breakthroughs to the political changes, I disagree with that. When the world is in change, if some smart science guys could persuade others to receive funding from public sources, they are winners, personally and professionally, even if no definite progress would be released. I don't predict that history will judge such neutrino scientists had ridiculed themselves by that FTL claim, but I bet if physics wants to accept the FTL effects, it would take years, long years, and we won't see that day in a near future. I think most of these stories originate from the difference between the real world, and the virtual world. Most people don't have a clear idea how retarded we are. You can simulate almost anything in the virtual graphics by powerful computers. For example, after watching the movie Lord of the Rings, Return of the King, no other movie could excite me about the scenes of ancient wars. Now, let's come back to reality, we are not sure about the number of dimensions in the universe. Intuitively, there are four ones, length, width, height and time, but there are other theories assuming 4D universe cannot answer some questions, so we need higher dimensions, even we are not sure about the universe, it might be a multi-verse at work. We don't know about more than 90% of the material in the known universe, i.e., dark matter and dark energy. We hardly go more than the earth orbit, regarding the proportion between human size and universe size, it's like an ant could travel at the most distance of one millimeter away! I extremely exaggerated that picture, what a boring life! So what's the solution? Many people would tend to dreaming and mental masturbations. Similar to this huge difference between real world and virtual world, there are other differences in other fields. If battery technology would have advanced like the memory technology, a tiny battery could have stored the energy of a nuclear plant inside it, but they're desperately weak. We can't control gravity, we're weak against natural forces, earthquake, tsunami, … Another example, there is a horrible difference between the medical progress and space progress. How? Let me explain. The medical advances don't let people die easily, so number of population is growing every year, the earth cannot bear all this population and we need other habitable planets, but space technology is too weak to solve this problem. One cannot say to people, please die soon for the sake of next generations, because there is no enough food and water, and resources for you and the present resources are running out. Living beings want to live based on instinct, we can't fight with instinct but we can ask authorities why there is no other planet for us? One planet is not enough and its weather is being polluted, we need to immigrate. That's a reason people like me tend to believe in UFOs or the idea that TPTB prevent advancing the mankind on purpose, and other conspiracy theories … Anyway, these differences are damaging the earth and its residents, but many ones do not like to believe …

Two technical discussions about my plan: http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43996 http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=110741 This planet is dying and many people do not want a real change. I don't know what would be the future, but it probably won’t be a good thing.

Tim Ventura has updated his website, and also my page: http://www.americanantigravity.com/interviews/mohammad-mansouryar-on-faster-than-light-travel.html How did I pass these 5 years since 2006? About 1 year for advertising my work plus writing two further papers, About 2 years in military, About 1 year trying to sell wind turbines, About 1 year working on my hybrid car plan … This is another address you can have my hybrid car plan: http://vixra.org/abs/1110.0049

I decided to present my plan for the public. I hope it would gain the attention of interested people of the automotive industry. I wish a person or company would want to realize it. I don't intend to have technical debate about it in this forum, however I welcome to such discussions on the technical forums. I will inform you about the progress about it. Here are download links: http://www.cleanmpg.com/forums/downloads.php?do=file&id=94&act=down http://www.4shared.com/document/wtlxTXWo/On_developing_a_powertrain_in_.html Also, I wrote a blog post on this news: http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2011/10/16/hybrid-automobile-with-two-propulsions-of-electricity-and-compressed-air/

I agree on Karl Popper philosophy of science, stating: " a theory should be considered scientific if and only if it is falsifiable". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper#Philosophy_of_science What can be said on this unnecessarily long movie? If he would have gone back to that mountain and let us see the sight where the beam landed, maybe one could consider it as an investigative attempt. He gave up at the end of the film, I didn't like it. If all we saw in that movie is for real, there is a probability that beam might be from a weapon. I cannot identify what type of technology was that, maybe laser …

This paper is about economy, not physics, but I enjoyed reading it: http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1109.5318 However, I prefer a more romantic approach for "organizing and financing interstellar space projects". Those decision makers who don't care about my spacewarp ideas, shall badly regret for that. Lately, DARPA and NASA have made a public symposium on interstellar travels. The news was published by several websites: http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/darpa-funding-interstellar-travel-study/ http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/06/nerds-darpa-wants-your-advice-on-interstellar-flight/ http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/08/with-grant-us-defense-research-agency-reaches-for-the-stars.php http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/space/deep/to-infinity-and-beyond-at-darpas-100-year-starship-symposium?click=pm_latest . It seems I've missed numerous hot topics in that meeting: http://www.100yss.org/agenda.html . About my electric car plan, I'm going to post cool stuffs soon …

Recently, I watched two interesting documentary television series about the universe: #1. Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking Related links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Into_the_Universe_with_Stephen_Hawking http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1655078/ http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/stephen-hawking/ #2. Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman (not all episodes yet) Related links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Through_the_Wormhole http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1513168/ http://science.discovery.com/tv/through-the-wormhole/ . I suggest watching them to anyone who likes physics and wants to know more. I liked #1 documentary a bit more.

So far, I've shown the details to two American friends whom both I trust and they know me for years. It seems they can't digest some of its details easily. About the USPs, there are several of them, chosen by me from the technology news. I checked them more and I found out those can be applied in an electric vehicle quite effectively. Instead of dealing with the structure of batteries or supercapacitors, I've cited about 386 hyperlinks as references and I've discussed in 47 pages how to charge the batteries mostly while driving. Also how to reduce the number of required batteries in favor of supercapacitors and other components. As two examples, there is a (green) mechanical system that is able to increase in fuel economy of an ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicle, up to 69%. I've suggested to combine it with the electric propulsion system of the car in a series-parallel fashion. At present, just a few large vehicles actually use this system in the conventional hybrid manner, i.e., along with gasoline. It's strange and unfortunate that I didn't find extensive usage of this system in the news. Another item is applying a method of experimental branch of high energy physics that can be within reach of producing electricity while driving the car, near a perpetual source of energy, at least in principal. It injects electricity into the car when it moves, and if the amount of entering electricity would be more than the amount exiting electricity by discharging the batteries while moving, I won't be surprised. Albeit the idea is complicated in practice, so no calculation would be straightforward for this item IMHO and the tests would be ultimate judge. Although, if one considers this item pessimistically and assumes this item could not provide all the needed electricity of the car, I would remind him the 69% increase in fuel economy mentioned above, plus the fact that electricity is just one of three green propulsion systems for this car, and remember there are further powerful electric items. Recently, some of my friends and relatives ask me what is your current project? I answer them I'm working on a hybrid car plan that I estimate you could plug in it for 5 minutes, then drive about 500 kilometers with a nice speed. In contrast with the present electric cars, it's a pretty big minivan, SUV, crossover, or station wagon, the bigger size the better propulsion; and it generates power when it moves, also in reverse order of ICE vehicles which fuel consumption grows sharply, more rugged & mountainous roads, more power generation!

OK, my bad, don't ignore him; he is a smart person and I wish him success. Also I guess he is pretty smart as a lawyer, but everybody should act in the related field. Einstein could not be a professional lawyer and he is not a professional physicist or cosmologist. I like to take someone seriously for technical affairs, if he concentrates only on his profession. It's not complete yet, I've prepared a draft and a friend told my English is terrible in that. I am working on its English and I do not plan to give it to the public for now. Firstly contacting my friends, secondly Iranian government, thirdly contacting big and small car companies, respectively German, Japanese, Korean & American companies (IMO they need and care about such plans) and fourthly if nobody would care to that as I expect, I'd publish it on internet, i.e., my website (it's down for a while) and some forums including this forum. Its size is about 5MB so I can't upload it in here, but I might upload the files on another web services, then put the links in here. Maybe somebody in here would want to collaborate with me to realize the car. However, if you are interested, I can send my draft to your email, just to know about it and perhaps give me feedback on it, not to publish it.

1 . At post #223, I commented about him. Well, like a professional lawyer, he knows how to speak, good for him, but I'd like to hear his replies to his critics, such as these threads: Andrew D. Basiago - truth? project pegasus how much you believe You can find other threads on his story by a simple searching, for example: "Andrew D. Basiago" site:abovetopsecret.com, Coast 2 Coast PROJECT PEGASUS ~ US Space Time Program site:abovetopsecret.com, and some cool comments of the clip. However, let's assume this way: As he tells in his website, one of his ultimate purposes of saying these stories is to lobby the US government to disclose its teleportation secret so that teleportation can be adopted on a global basis to help humanity achieve planetary sustainability in the 21st century. I respect his goal, but I don't like this picture, I like to gain that "secret" by my efforts instead. If a government has kept this wonderful discovery and if we accept that a number of humans – as we know human characteristics – have been able to bear this secret for decades, there is no reason they would want to give it to others. I think this planet is dying (Klaatu is right!, however he's wrong on changing us, absolute portion of us do not change …) and humans should not sit on their hands and do nothing about it, let's forget stupid criminals who help that dying process. To me, I think my wormhole idea can solve the energy and teleportation problems in large scales, and my green car plan can do the same in the small scales. Maybe he is not an disinfo agent or another lawyer who likes gaining attention as some have said, people like him make the world less boring, and maybe he thinks this is the best of him to do something useful. When I was younger, I was crazy for these stuffs, but after passing years of devoting my life for them, I see them just as raw materials suitable to start making someone like the subject, or making a social acceptance that if someday a big discovery would be made, people would be familiar with these concepts. Therefore, we need to understand the frames of said words. For example in the atmosphere of cold war the superpowers could persuade their people to pay for the space race, they had already prepared them mentally. My point is you cannot reach to a scientific fact from his claims, no math, no prediction to establish an experiment that might bring an advancement. Please note to these items. 2. About the post #223, I found this related long thread, having cool posts: Engineer Behind Iranian Saucer Technology Comes Forward 3. Everything that does not affect you and you are unaware of it, is nearly nothing to you. The wildest classified projects are so, although I surely would like them to be disclosed for the good of the humanity as soon as possible. As an example, I think gaining the water directly from the air can be a nice discovery and I've proposed it for the cooling system of my car plan. See this: Making Water From Thin Air This is just one component of my plan and now I believe the power of thinking and the probability of being something unbelievable as the form of a secret project, more than before. My own car plan is a good sample IMO; it is not like the wormhole details that many ones cannot understand, it's a car powertrain based on rather simple technologies and in principal, it could run nearly without fuel, (the same charging for an electric car). My program is to give it to my friends, or ones I think I can trust them to verify it, then I hope an automobile company would like to invest on it, also I like to do something satisfying about it here in Iran, to get rid of the environment pollution.

To explore the deep space, my chosen propulsion method, is decreasing the path by bending the spacetime; increasing velocity methods are out of my expertise and interest. I don't think the claimed flying saucer built in Iran could use that technology (with hard evidences). Anyway, I wish success for him to make people happy by his technology.

DARPA Wants Your Ideas for a 100-Year Starship http://www.universetoday.com/85833/darpa-wants-your-ideas-for-a-100-year-starship/#more-85833 ... not a fresh news, however it sounds interesting ...

As long as there would be no solution for the 3 problems I mentioned above on using hydrogen as a car fuel (originated by water or anything else), I don't accept the whole idea as a green propulsion. I am working on a design of a green car which I bet you'd love it. There is a vital factor that if goes OK, it'd make that car, BADLY GREEN! You have no idea how much that could be environmental friendly. That program has engaged most of my time these days, I hope to finish it before the end of this Persian year. My great personal motivation on working on this plan is the polluted weather of Tehran where I live now. Here are some recent pictures of the city: http://www.ayandenews.com/news/21651 (comparing between good old days & now) http://www.ayandenews.com/news/21565/ (more images of the pollution) . Generally, I am aware of the content of a webpage, before linking it. To search a subject on internet is an important skill; it matters to know what kind of information are useful and which of them are not; also I use internet rather a lot and whenever I get online, I usually click this bookmarked link and check out the new pages, it takes some seconds or minutes to get over it. The subject I have most data about, is myself, so it is a kind of criterion to do the same kind of searching on other subjects.

IMHO, there are three problems on using hydrogen for propelling cars; small, intermediate, and big problems: . 1. (Small) The process of gaining hydrogen takes energy and needs equipments. Fortunately the experts are working on this problem rather well. Let's also be hopeful about the maintaining and safety issues while driving the car ... and tax! 2. (Intermediate) The idea of using fuel for a car is not so hot to me. That would be great if the cars would not need any specific fuel, such as solar-powered cars. 3. (Big) According to this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_ga....27s_atmosphere , the water vapor is the number one reason of greenhouse effects, also due to this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_ef...reenhouse_gases , and such cars emit water (steam?) at their tailpipes … Imagine a parking lot, full of hydrogen-fuelled cars where is not strongly air-conditioned, I guess that place would look like a sauna! Now generalize this picture … ** ** ** ** To avoid a completely off-topic post, I put these two new-found links in here to not lose them in the future: http://nemesis.startrek.com/boards-topic/3...rp-drive?page=2 I don't know why is my name in this clip?! People: Phil Dent, P. K. Iyengar, Michael Bartosh, Paek Hak-rim, Donald Vining, Harald Cramér, Inez Baskin, Mohammad Mansouryar, Margaret Maron, Andrew Cawt... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz1S3QsrqH0

Months ago, I came across a news on a magazine about a Japanese company that had developed a car, working only by water as its fuel. I had kept that in a corner of my mind, but several weeks ago that I started my studies on the green propulsion methods for the cars, I found the related wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-fuelled_car You can read a section about that news which had drawn my attention already: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-fuelled...r_Energy_System I don't think using hydrogen as a fuel (originated by water or something else) is the best possible fuel for the cars; my two reasons are: The process of producing the hydrogen takes energy, and it emits the steam which causes the greenhouse effects. Although, those seem pretty better than fossil fuels; but if a revolutionary breakthrough would be happened in this field, such as using the produced hydrogen in a cold fusion mechanism for the cars (even at infinitesimal amounts, i.e., a bunch of atoms for every turn of driving a car), or a nanotechnological innovation to remove the drawbacks of using water for its hydrogen contents … maybe that would turn out to be the suitable solution for the future cars. By that date, the electric cars and compressed air cars are more environment-friendly IMHO. BTW, I'm sorry for that Aussie geezer, maybe it's happened in a far past and there is no such stupidities for now?! TPTB heat up the earth by burning fossil fuels, and they suppress a technology of using water, then the water comes back with a vengeance as the flood to that island! It's a pity …

@callmejoe, The idea of using water as a fuel is interesting to me either, but the related technology is several years away IMO, while the electric car technology is present and fortunately developing, so why should we ignore this possibility of having a greener world? Also, I liked this thread: http://www.greenenergyinvestors.com/index....c=6720&st=0 … BTW, water is a precious substance in dry regions, like the Mideast (where I live), north Africa, … @DrBubb, Thanks for the right decision, I hope you wouldn't change your mind! Instead of Roger Kerr, I guess you meant Roy Kerr; however, there is a big problem: How can we create and control a BLACK HOLE? Please pay attention we are talking about a BLACK HOLE! Most dangerous object of the universe in many aspects … besides there are further problems: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_metric#K...es_as_wormholes About this JT hoax, … well if you look at the posts of this thread: http://www.greenenergyinvestors.com/index....showtopic=13377 In particular the No6's posts, it is clear there are many flaws with JT's claims … what may I say more? If someone is belong to a future in which he is able to go back in time by influencing the spacetime continuum, what is the reason of having "High speed trains"?

A summary of the book that was introduced at the post #151: http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1063 Progress in revolutionary propulsion physics; Authors: Marc G. Millis; (Submitted on 5 Jan 2011) And another related paper by the same author: http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1066 Energy, incessant obsolescence, and the first interstellar missions . **** . For several days, I've been working on a plan of the electric cars. I think the made and would-be-made electric cars are very similar to each other (AFAIK), but my plan is interestingly different from them. The batteries get charged by four ways which one of them is an improved application of an old technology, … it fascinated me, I bet that's so for the GEI guys. I claim my plan removes many drawbacks of the current electric cars and if it would find its market, a great success would be coming. I consider it as a gold mine for a car company. I wish I knew what to do about it. Any suggestions?

Bruce Cathie, Andrew D. Basiago, Marko Rodin . Forget these three gentlemen. Related thread on the last one: http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=25520

I couldn't contact to the blog author, it's pity they spend for low-ranged things, compared to my wormhole idea, anyway, that's the way it is: . Nasa Seeks 'Warp Drive', Anti-Gravity Space Craft http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2...ti-gravity.html

Someday, I would have the situation to watch it completely, I hope so; anyway, these two episodes of X-files on Area 51, are interesting & entertaining IMO: The episodes #4 & #5 of season 6 Link1, Link2. Download them ; ... ... ... ... Dreamland (size: 350MB, length: 00:45:23): http://rapidshare.com/files/155928116/X-F....4.WzT.part1.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/156144205/X-F....4.WzT.part2.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/156169879/X-F....4.WzT.part3.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/156195797/X-F....4.WzT.part4.rar Dreamland II (size: 350MB, length: 00:44:20): http://rapidshare.com/files/156241589/X-F....5.WzT.part1.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/156434366/X-F....5.WzT.part2.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/156457768/X-F....5.WzT.part3.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/156486372/X-F....5.WzT.part4.rar . . . Unzip the *.rar files and enjoy!

@callmejoe Mostly this EXCERPT drew my attention: @DrBubb I think the works done by Hutchison and Podkletnov cannot be classified as the science, simply because others have not been able to repeat them in standard conditions. If one mentions the public is unaware of the rest of their stories, at least a satisfying theory needs to be presented; so they are out of my current considerations.

Reading this story made my day: . Breaking the Law of Gravity By Charles Platt http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.03/antigravity_pr.html . Don't care to its publishing date, it's really well-written & straightforward. I wish all the science journalists would have written this style. This is a search results list on Podkletnov at arXiv. Just want to have this link in somewhere to not forget it.