yes, I remember that. when gold hit $1000 they printed a huge picture of a bar of gold, not on the front of the business section, but on the front page of the main section for all to see.
I've had some credit card fraud trouble, and I've had numpties take too much out of my account by direct debt, but I've never had any cash/PMs stolen from any place I've lived in. Real crooks wear suits.
http://www.fgmr.com/confiscation.htm
yep. the 1930s was economically sh1t, but the gov't remained very much intact (in fact the state grew even larger of course).
this time round is a different kettle of fish.
the timing was perfect. those in the know could see the UK state failure was a dead cert, and so pocketed the half the nations gold at rock bottom price.
he is the sort of w4anker that probably ended up with some of it.
yeah, got one just before christmas. apple do make good laptops, but most of the stuff they make now is just very well marketed horse cr4p.
if all the people that only buy apple stuff because it's 'cool' stopped buying apple stuff tomorrow then apple would be well and truely fooked.
Didn't someone once buy an entire block in Berlin for 24 oz gold in the good old Weimar days?
In that case, there's no way I'm shelling out a whole 50 oz on just one house
The ratio between the spot prices is indeed very high, but the ratio between the price I can actually obtain gold bullion and the price I can actually obtain silver bullion is much lower.
Anyone else also finding this?
And which ratio do you think is more important when comparing with historic trends?