mSparks

Glad its not just me getting hit by the double post thing....

"real americans"only if you dont consider blacks, hispanics or immigrants (after date xxxx) to be "real americans" Challenging the establishment: yes, revoking healthcare for the 99% is going to work out great, and definately not what the "establishment" want. Brave enough to take on the global elites... well... theres the biggest problem. because. imho. that is pure spin. Probably better described as offer the global elites everything and exactly what they want, no matter how much it upsets everyone. Do not let your very valid loathing of Hitlary cloud your judgement when assesing the alternative. Compare what he is saying he will do with what the power players in the US want. case in point - revoke Obamacare. The republicans butchered obamacare since they took control 4 years ago. it could of been an awesome project. delivering healthcare to the US population similar to many other modern economies. But instead of fixing it. He wants to go back to the situation where everything americans pay for their healthcare goes to line the pockets of insurance companies executives, while they offer a service little better than you can get for free in the deepest depths of the African jungle. http://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21639432-depressing-story-behind-barack-obamas-biggest-achievement-good-bad-and-ugly

Bernie is an honest man who actually cares about and respects his constituents. (((Trump))) is an ______ Yeah, filling in that blank probably won't help much. And I'm sure you are perfectly capable of doing that on your own. Do you play chess?

https://m.oddschecker.com/m/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2016/winner 4/7 on Clinton is offered by betfred 2/1 on trump is offered by Boyle Sports Most off is sanders. He's still paying 25/1 so if you are dead certain Hillary won't win it a sanders trump combo is a good win no loss.

She's still odds on at 4/7 to trumps 2/1. I know that you cannot live on hope alone, but without it, life is not worth living.

Is that better or worse than sharing and discussing top secret intelligence with a vp of Goldman?

Really? I'd have a hard time believing any regular there would have the technical expertise or inclination to do anything untoward here. Relationship was always cordial as far as I knew, just a different focus. Here was all about gold and hardcore preppers. There was just about watching the credit implosion and its effects on the housing market. Had a fair few attacks there to. I even started documenting (and cross posting) when they happened (a good thing now cc has gone). http://www.theborgmatrix.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=1562 What makes you think they came from cc?

It would appear creditcrunch.co.uk is rip

It was a $6.5Billion loss funnily enough the Beeb story has now been edited to say both their profit halved and they made the biggest loss in two decades. -> ROFL, fuxing retards

cool. here's the picture on nasa http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG

Sorry, no Alien life to report. But just back from watching "The Martian" in the cinema http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=4731 And have to recommend it. Very pleasant movie.

http://ecat.com/news/e-cat-patent-granted-by-uspto lol I saw the new post here and thought "hmm, been a while since I've looked at the ecat", found the patent (from August....) and came back to post it. Should of guessed that was the new post, I'd of saved myself half an hour.

Bacteria Make Diesel Molecules By engineering the genome of E. coli with genes from several sources, scientists have coaxed the microbe to produce diesel-replica hydrocarbons. By Dan Cossins | April 24, 2013 http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/35293/title/Bacteria-Make-Diesel-Molecules/

as long as the Chinese government is putting its tax income into the stock market rather than gold. gold is going nowhere.

well, not all bonds... Greece Ten Year Government Bond Spread- 10.44%

Historically we've just bumped off our creditors. Not sure that's on option this time round, but they'll probably try.

And just in case you only have access to corporate media. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_protests (although I disagree whole heartedly with the US health insurance support)

Its Anti deflationary As oppossed to "inflationary" http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/mbs_faq.html These securities were trading in the open market (where the fed bought them) at double digit percentage rates of interest (excluding defaults), The premise is high interest rates are deflationary. _____ As a caveat, there is a "not disproven" theory that medium to long term high interest rates are inflationary, and low interest rates are deflationary, I plan to "prove" it either way if we enter deflation proper (which if its going to occur will start around the beginning of 011) using what I refer to as the "money in the pot" model part of http://www.theborgmatrix.com/ltk/index2.php/milliEcon-v2/29. _______ Also, beware of the use of "Guaranteed" and "as security" - these aren't purchases but collateral which is something different.

If a mortgage backed security was supposed to pay 6% But is only paying 5% for a 25 year maturity instrument they still have a saleable value significantly above (the £138 in the treasury case) the "face value" (the £100 in a treasury case) in a 0.5% interest rate environment, this has sweet f' all to do with "overpaying", its just basic finance. The point is, even with record low interest rates, lenders are still struggling to find people who will borrow off them. £220Bln is barely enough to cover the money that used to be created by RBS all on its own, must be even worse in the US with the actual loss of Lehman. So if the BoE creates £220Bln and RBS stops creating £400Bln There is still less money than there was before.

Thats not true though is it? Is it not just that they are sold to the central bank at 0.5% yield? Kind of like a normal investor buying an 8.75% Treasury bond with a face value of £100 maturing in 2017, for £138 ("over inflated" by 38%) in a 0.5% interest rate environment.

ripping off the poor and disadvantaged for profit has always been "legal" in capitalist society, except for a few exceptions where TPTB don't get enough of a cut to risk the backlash. Doesn't mean its legitimate.

non "forged" money does not cause any kind of inflation, it is destroyed once it is used - i.e. runs through the legitimate taxation cycle. For inflation Either its literally forged - as in not created by those responsible for its legitimate uses. Or its objectively forged - as in created for illegitimate purposes by those responsible for its uses (the common explanation for Weinmar - "pretending" to pay off debt). Albert Einstein Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

But with printed paper, you can walk into a factory and buy all their stock for the next 2 months with little to no traceability to your forged notes. Digital digits have a heritage you cannot escape from, hard for them to escape into peoples hands when they are just filling a void of defaulted digital digits. Are you referring to some kind of HI not caused by expansion of the monetary base?

Let me put it this way. US and UK QE only covers some $2Trln of the >$10Trln contraction in Corporate Money. It was opportunistic rather than inflationary saviour printing. No one wants $'s £'s or €'s for anything other than paying down debt, because you can't buy shit with them and the tax regimes are so godawfull. I've yet to see one piece of evidence of "inflation", most of the rebounds in prices over the past few months are barely explained by closing out of short positions as interest rates crashed through the floor. Let alone any increase in $/£/€ transactions. This is all completely separate from "hyperinflation" - which is a rapid expansion of the base currency, usually via projects such as Operation Bernhard, of which all the British ones still seem to be classified, even American ones are barely declassified: https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-...i3a06p_0001.htm But at least they point out "The British were by far the best". Which explains why the imperial empires enemies have such a nasty historical habbit of catching a dose of Hyperinflation. _____

Sure, but these have nothing to do with "money printing" its just "hot money" chasing one asset yield after another. It always has been thus, only now, as the global economy digitizes, there's more hot money than there was before, and global transactions are escaping the death grips of the old families in the new netocracy. Much of these problems the westernized economies are facing are not so much a shortage of assets, but rather a shortage of assets denominated in Royal/Federal Currency.