Jump to content

America After the Coup d'état / Pt1: The Leader of the Decaying World -

Recommended Posts

America after the Coup d'Etat :

Part One: The Leader of the Decaying World

= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vso2Rob0PAg =

Published on Oct 9, 2014 / Description:


American After the Coup d'état / Part One: The Leader of the Decaying World -
The soul of America has been lost in a "silent coup d'état." The key virtues of: a Free Economy, competitive markets, a Free press, and the moral basis for society are no longer respected. The country's DECAY began with the assassination of JFK - Lee Oswald did not do it. The real crime was covered up by the FBI and LBJ. The worst thing was, getting away with the horrific crime, made BOLD the perpetrators of this crime, and they have pushed America further and further from the vision of the Free Country, envisioned by the Founders.

(There was some help in putting this together from "Victor" a private contractor who has done work for the US military. He promises to give me more detail, for a Part 2 - if this video is well received, so please give it a LIKE, and pass the link on to those you think may be interested,)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George H W Bush - the New World Order speech - 9./11/1991 (ten years before...)

George Bush Sr. New World Order Live Speech Sept 11 1991 (or 1990)

Transcript: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/war/bushsr.htm

Ross Perot - "The Giant Sucking sound"

Giant Sucking Sound - Ross Perot 1992 Presidential Debate.flv

= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkgx1C_S6ls =

Uploaded on Dec 6, 2009

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Real Household Incomes have not risen much in the last four decades




95th : 111,900 : 186,000 : +66.2%

90th : $88,600 : 143,600 : +62.1%

50th : $42,100 : $50,100 : +19.0%

10th : $09,600 : $12,000 : +25.0%

Mult : r- 2.658 : r- 3.713 : +39.7% : 95th/50th


Median Real Incomes : $56,000 : $51,500 : - 8.1%


incomes.jpg : income.jpg?w=500



> source: http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/parsing-piketty-is-wealth-inequality-rising-in-the-u-s

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Possibly. For those of you who care, and can read, take the time to read this lengthy article.

If you don't read it, that says to me you don't care enough. I know several members who will read it.


Last Edited by Desert Fox on 06/07/2013 /

GLP-1: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2256697/pg1

GLP-2: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2663102/pg1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a decaying society, art, if it is truthful, must also reflect decay.

And unless it wants to break faith with its social function, art must show the world as changeable.

And help to change it.

Ernst Fischer : http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/e/ernstfisch109043.html




Well, I think most would agree that American art of the last 3-4 decades has been decadent


It is especially true in the Music industry

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Iran-Contra Affair Scandal Explained: US History Review

= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nix_vj2DaqQ =


(from the Leader of the Decaying World video):

One program that went awry, and got uncovered, was what became known as the Iran contra affair. This was one of those complex schemes that seems typical of black programs. The plot was hatched, supposedly to free American hostages, and the Israelis - as usual - were part of the complex plan. In violation of an arms embargo, the US government sold arms to Iran, with Israel's Mossad acting as a hidden agent handling the shipment. Part of the illegal scheme where uncovered, the schemers changed the flow of funds, and money got diverted to fund Nicaraguan contras. When the plans came to light, a colonel called Oliver North got hauled in front of an investigation in the US congress. North gave a great performance at the hearings, and managed to win over a compliance congress, and much of the American public., who were then very naive about the many creative schemes used to fund "black ops", hidden and secret. (There were also rumors, which are ongoing, that the has US been involved in narcotics to fund its secret operations.)


Oliver North, Osama bin Laden Hoax, Iran Contra Hearings

= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiIbOZ2YI0U =


/ want more? - here are many hours Video of the hearings /


How much Reagan knew, and when he knew it was a subject of discussion on the floor of congress. Reagan was believed to know only about the Nicaraguan part of the plan, and was a supporter of the Contras. The involvement of then-Vice President Bush was lightly examined - and it seems probable that he would have had greater knowledge and much greater involvement than the President. Reagan was called the "teflon president", to whom nothing stuck. And in this case, his "super power" seems to have extended to his Vice President too. The public's memory was short. At one time the scandal was thought to make Bush unelectable. But he went on to win the nomination unopposed, and go on to beat Michael Dukakis in the 1988 election, marking a rare three consecutive victories for Republicans. The good economy, and a stable international stage were seen as assets that made this near-miracle possible. This "achievement" also allowed the black military operations to go on growing

=== ===


The scandal did not come out by accident.

Harvard-trained lawyer, Daniel Sheehan was involved:




Dan and his Christic Institute colleagues uncovered and investigated the infamous "Off-The-Shelf, Stand Alone, Self-Financing 'Private' Covert Operations ENTERPRISE" OF Lt. Colonel Oliver North and The Reagan/Bush Administration and then triggered The Iran-Contra Scandal with their filing of the Federal Criminal Racketeering Act civil lawsuit against 29 of the "retired" former C.I.A. and U.S. Pentagon covert operations specialists who were the founders and leaders of that "ENTERPRISE." While that suit failed to secure a final civil judgment, it succeeded in uncovering - and publicly-exposing - the long-time pattern of criminal activity conducted by those individuals inside the US intelligence community.

> http://www.danielpsheehan.com/about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FEMA was part of the (anti-terrorist) plan - even back in the Iran-Contra days


(watch this short video, for confirmation... and evidence of a cover-up)


BUSH was involved then too


Iran-Contra: Jack Brooks Makes Oliver North Quiver In Fear



= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XijfvAhkT0 =

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CONFIRMING (maybe) Nixon's ambitions, and Ford's role


Tom Valentine rebuke / Nixon Coup ►William Cooper ► 06.28.1993
Published on Feb 7, 2013

In the summer of 1973, Republicans partial to Nixon had announced to the Washington media that they wanted Nixon to be elected to a third term and had organized a group known as 'The Committee to Repeal the Twenty-Second Amendment'. The movement sort of died within a couple of weeks. Then in October, came the rumor that Nixon may be considering a military coup to stay in office. Gen. Alexander Haig told the Congress during his confirmation hearings for the position of Secretary of State on January, 1981, that some people in Washington were "flirting with solutions which would have been extra-Constitutional". Watergate Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski warned the grand jury that if they decided to indict Nixon he might use force to remain in office. In June, 1982, Harold Evans, Watergate grand juror, appearing on a segment of the ABC-TV news show "20/20." said that Jaworski told them that if they indicted Nixon he might "surround the White House with armed forces."

On October 26, 1973, in a Washington Star article called "Has President Nixon Gone Crazy?" syndicated columnist Carl Rowan wrote: "...in the face of a vote to impeach he might try, as 'commander-in-chief' to use military forces to keep himself in power." In another article called "The Pardon," in the August, 1983 edition of the Atlantic Monthly, Seymour Hersh, one of Nixon's Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote that in a December 22, 1973 meeting: "He kept on referring to the fact that he may be the last hope, (that) the Eastern elite was out to get him. He kept saying, 'This is our last and best hope. The last chance to resist the fascists'. His words brought me straight up out of my chair. I felt the President, without the words having been said, was trying to sound us out to see if we would support him in some extra-constitutional action ...


The Dark Side of Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger: Seymour Hersh Interview (1983)


= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Txq3kSKirDs =


Published on Jul 13, 2013

The term Watergate has come to encompass an array of clandestine and often illegal activities undertaken by members of the Nixon administration. Those activities included "dirty tricks" such as bugging the offices of political opponents and people of whom Nixon or his officials were suspicious. Nixon and his close aides ordered harassment of activist groups and political figures, using the FBI, CIA, and the Internal Revenue Service. The activities became known after five men were caught breaking into Democratic party headquarters at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972. The Washington Post picked up on the story; reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward relied on an informant known as "Deep Throat"—later revealed to be Mark Felt, associate director at the FBI—to link the men to the Nixon administration. Nixon downplayed the scandal as mere politics, calling news articles biased and misleading. As a series of revelations made it clear that Nixon aides had committed crimes in attempts to sabotage the Democrats and others, senior aides such as White House Counsel John Dean and Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman faced prosecution.[104][194][195]

In July 1973, White House aide Alexander Butterfield testified that Nixon had a secret taping system that recorded his conversations and phone calls in the Oval Office. These tapes were subpoenaed by Watergate Special Counsel Archibald Cox. Nixon refused to release them, citing executive privilege. With the White House and Cox at loggerheads, Nixon had Cox fired in October in the "Saturday Night Massacre"; he was replaced by Leon Jaworski. In November, Nixon's lawyers revealed that an audio tape of conversations, held in the White House on June 20, 1972, featured an 18½ minute gap.[195] Rose Mary Woods, the President's personal secretary, claimed responsibility for the gap, alleging that she had accidentally wiped the section while transcribing the tape, though her tale was widely mocked. The gap, while not conclusive proof of wrongdoing by the President, cast doubt on Nixon's statement that he had been unaware of the cover-up.[196]


At the height of Kissinger's prominence, many commented on his wit. In one instance, at the Washington Press Club annual congressional dinner, "Kissinger mocked his reputation as a secret swinger."[76] He was quoted as saying "Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac."[77]

Kissinger has shied away from mainstream media and cable talk shows. He granted a rare interview to the producers of a documentary examining the underpinnings of the 1979 peace treaty between Israel and Egypt entitled Back Door Channels: The Price of Peace.[78] In the film, a candid Kissinger reveals how close he felt the world was to nuclear war during the 1973 Yom Kippur War launched by Egypt and Syria against Israel.

=== ===


According the Roger XX, Nixon Recorded all those conversations in the White House,

so that he could give history a record of his side of the story of the Vietnam War and the pullout,

rather than Kissinger's side




= x =

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several good comments are being posted UNDER THE VIDEO.


Keep them rolling !

It would be great if this would GO VIRAL


One Comment:

"It's a neat summary of the last 50 Years, and how We-the-People have lost power"


Here's another Video that covers some of the same history : over 65,000 hits !

An American Military Coup & Dead Banksters -- Dave Hodges


Link to comment
Share on other sites

DECAY in the UK


Britain’s decaying towns Some towns cannot be preserved. Save their inhabitants instead

Oct 12th 2013




IN THEIR day they were the engines of the world economy, noisy with steam hammers and black with soot. They were never huge—in 1862 William Gladstone called Middlesbrough an “infant Hercules”—but most are smaller than they once were. Despite dollops of public money and years of heroic effort, a string of towns and smallish cities in Britain’s former industrial heartlands are quietly decaying.


Middlesbrough, Burnley, Hartlepool, Hull and many others were in trouble even before the financial crisis. These days their unemployment rates are roughly double the national average, and talented young people are draining away (see article). Their high streets are thick with betting shops and payday lenders, if they are not empty. Wolverhampton looks the worst, having condemned parts of its town centre for a shopping mall that never came.

. . .

The fate of these once-confident places is sad. That so many well-intentioned people are trying so hard to save them suggests how much affection they still claim. The coalition is trying to help in its own way, by setting up “enterprise zones” where taxes are low and broadband fast. But these kindly efforts are misguided. Governments should not try to rescue failing towns. Instead, they should support the people who live in them.


That means helping them to commute or move to places where there are jobs—and giving them the skills to get those jobs. Some of this is being done. More money is now going to schools in poor areas, thanks to a policy known as the pupil premium. Transport is going the wrong way, though. Claiming that it will help the north of England, the government wants to pour money into a high-speed railway line that would connect London with Leeds and Manchester. But the north is big, and the line goes nowhere near many of the trouble spots. Leeds is only slightly closer to Hartlepool than London is to Calais. Unglamorous things like expanding bus networks and improving signalling, so that it is possible to run more regional trains, would be more helpful...

. . .

Winners need help, too

Big cities would be finer still if they were allowed to grow. Many are hemmed in by green belts, where development is all but banned. These push up property prices, putting them out of reach of many people from poorer places. If the green belts were done away with or (more realistically) thinned, some people’s house prices would drop but the nation as a whole would benefit.


Hasn’t America tried more-or-less letting cities grow and shrink naturally, and isn’t the result Detroit?

Yes, but this is to focus on one side of the ledger. America has some shockingly ruined cities, but it also has shockingly successful, fast-growing ones, like Houston and Raleigh. And Detroit was brought down partly by the weight of pensions owed to its police and other public-sector workers. In British towns, pensions are either much better funded or are paid by the national treasury.

Place and community are important. But new communities can be created in growing suburbs fringing successful cities. It has happened before. The towns that are now declining were once growing quickly, denuding other settlements, often in the countryside.


The Cotswolds were the industrial engines of their day. One reason they are now so pretty is that, centuries ago, huge numbers of people fled them.


> http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21587790-city-sicker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More on UK DECAY, from the Tesco thread


The middle class are slowly getting poorer. After the financial crisis, the middle class have been squeezed, and now probably running down savings. 5 years sounds about right. The rich have got richer as Waitrose supermarkets are enjoying healthy sales.


The EU is on the brink of another recession - Germany is reporting a shrinkage in manufacturing, so I am expecting a tough winter in the EU zone.


People have to make a choice, continue to shop at big supermarkets, or go to cheap discount shops such as Lidl or Aldi which have seen double digit growth year on year. They are no frills, no loyalty cards, no fancy brands. Just a choice of two makes of bread or rice, or milk - they stack them high and sell them cheap. I think the UK is returning to the norm - where ever you go in the world, supermarkets have always been relatively expensive for most of the population. The UK I have felt, has lived beyond it's means.


Some people have said that the discounters are a vision of an alternative future, a future where communism has won!

(Well at least the shelves are full)





^ASDA (WMT, as Walmart traded in the NYSE), Tesco, Sainsburys, Morrisons share prices.

See how ASDA is very strong compared to the UK rivals. Additionally the US stock markets are much stronger than the UK markets.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harvard lawyer Daniel Sheehan reveal the details of the complex conspiracy that killed JFK


Daniel Sheehan Presents Conspiracy Theories ... - 1:37 hoours


= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRH4WcjVdwY =


There was a conspiracy to kill Castro, and Lee Harvey Oswald was the "designated patsy".

The plotters used this set up to eliminate JFK


... an even more detailed presentation:


Daniel Sheehan and Alternative Theories of the JFK Assassination Nov. 21, 2013 - 2:40 hours


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some similar thoughts here (?)


End of America A movie you must see to believe YouTube 1


Naomi Wolf The End of America ...

= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqRyUQzokYs =

Published on Dec 6, 2012

Naomi Wolf presents you with the truth. Remember this was done BO before Obama was president.There is an up date to this done at the 2014 Liberty forum she is just as critical of POTUS today.
Naomi Wolf The End of America revisited New Hampshire Liberty Forum 2014


"A love America because I'm FREE!."

Yeah. It was like that once. Before the Fear was stimulated so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Mike Harris on VT - reports a rumor: "Ross Perot may throw his hat in the ring" (2016 Race)

... at 1:00 Hours in :

Veterans Today Radio (11-6-14) Mike Harris, Jim Dean, Vinny Eastwood, Gordon Duff

= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s8uc6BL718 =

Ross Perot, was born June 27, 1930 - which makes him now 84.


A bit too old to run for President, I would have thought.

But clearly a better choice than Hillary or Jeb Bush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Confirms some of the Info from the After the Coup Video:

Gordon Novel & Jack Sarfatti - Conversation with the Avians=


Novel says that it might have been Rockefeller and Kissinger conspiring together who killed JFK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...


This old video suddenly got a ton of hist on July 4th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

DEEP STATE : I found this interview to be very revealing

Everyone should know by now (or soon) that Mark Gilbert is talking about the Reality of the control structure in the USA and Globally

"The United States is an Empire, and there is Huge money" (to be gained by controlling it)

Coast To Coast AM - April 23, 2017 The Deep State & More


Profile of Presidents

JFK : Fought the Deep state and was killed to make way for LBJ, whom the Deep state worked with
Nixon : As President, he started to become independent, and tried to reform the CIA. Watergate was a coup
Ford : Secret to him becoming President was his involvement in the JFK coverup. Half-hearted attempts to replace him
Carter : An honest guy, fighting corruption, but with backing of the Rockefellers; he had a lot of pushback
Reagan : A puppet of GHWB and the deep state; so old, he did not have the level of focus to check them
Bush : Pivotal character; a senior planner of JFK's assassination; behind watergate, drug trafficking; 9/11?
Clinton : Brilliant & charismatic, but protected drug transhipment in AK, to gain money & power

Obama : A tool of the Deep State, with some powerful forces helping him. Sexually compromised?
Trump : An outsider who may have upset the plans of some parts of the Deep state, operates w/ Deep state's themes


This helps to complete and Update the history from the Video on the original post, America after the Coup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

If there really is a "TRUMP INSURGENCY" (MAGA?)

SPY (etf for S&P500) vs GAF stocks ... update


then taking down or co-opting the Silicon Valley giants (& their leftwing globalism) is likely to be part of it


> https://medium.com/deep-code/situational-assessment-2017-trump-edition-d189d24fc046

The Trump Insurgency : Situational Assessment

I want to focus specifically on the victory of the “Trump Insurgency” and drill down into detail on how this state change will play out.

the election of 2016 was not an example of “ordinary politics”.... the only real pattern I can find is the 1776 “election” (AKA the American Revolution). In other words, while 2016 still formally looked like politics, what is really going on here is a revolutionary war. For now this is war using memes rather than bullets, but war is much more than a metaphor.

This war is about much more than ideology, money or power. Even the participants likely do not fully understand the stakes. At a deep level, we are right in the middle of an existential conflict between two entirely different and incompatible ways of forming “collective intelligence”. ..... So I’m going to ... walk through a series of “fronts” of the war that I see playing out over the next several years.

Front One: Communications Infrastructure.

.... the first step of any conflict is to disrupt the enemy’s communications and control infrastructure.

Our legacy sensemaking system was largely composed of and dominated by a small set of communications channels. These included the largest newspapers (e.g., NYT and Washington Post) and television networks (e.g., CNN, CBS, Fox, etc.). Until very recently, effectively all sensemaking was mediated by these channels and, as a consequence, these channels delivered a highly effective mechanism for coordinated messaging and control. ...

..... Rather than endeavoring to establish control over the legacy infrastructure, the Trump Insurgency is in the process of destroying it entirely and replacing it with a very different architecture. ....

....They are simultaneously attacking the legacy power structures on multiple fronts (access, business viability and, in particular, legitimacy) while innovating entirely novel approaches to the problem of large scale communications and control (e.g., direct tweets from POTUS). ...

.... The Trump Insurgency .... form of governance is structurally incompatible with the legacy media architecture. It is intrinsically dissonant with the kind of top-down, slow, controlled, synchronized approach of the old media. It therefore both must dismantle this architecture and replace it with one that is in synch with its mode of operation and, thereby, benefits massively by hamstringing any collective intelligence that works in the old top-down fashion (i.e., all existing forces currently at play).

 I fully expect the Insurgency to win this fight. .... I expect the memetic efficacy of the New York Times, CNN, the Washington Post, MSNBC and related channels to be near zero within the next two to four years. I would not be surprised to see several of these entities actually out of business.

... the relative position of “new media” such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube is harder to predict. I suspect that most of the important conflict of this front will take place here. Right now, all of new media is controlled by forces broadly opposed to the Insurgency. Yet the Insurgency must establish dominance on this territory. They can accomplish this either by capturing these existing platforms (aka “bend the knee” capitulation) or by moving the center of power to new platforms that are aligned with the Insurgency (e.g., gab.ai replacing Twitter).....

... the decisive decision... is whether the “new media” remain coupled to the legacy power structures .... or decouple and enter into a direct conflict for “decentralized supremacy” .... If they choose the former, they will lose. If they choose the latter, the outcome is hard to predict.

Front Two: The Deep State

In ordinary politics, an elected candidate is expected to integrate with and make relatively small fine-tuning changes to the existing state apparatus and the mass of career bureaucrats that make up most of the actual machinery of government (AKA the “deep state”). ....

.... the Trump Insurgency has identified the Deep State itself as its central antagonist and is engaged in a direct existential conflict with it.

Normally this would be an easy win for the Deep State. .... The Deep State is massive, has access to vast resources and capabilities and has been in the business of controlling power for decades. But two things are moving in the Insurgency’s favor.

First, the Deep State appears to be fragmented. For example, the “Russian Hacking” scenario of the past two months looks surprisingly uncoordinated and incompetent. .... it is clearly not the product of a unified and smoothly operating Deep State.

Second, it seems highly likely that the Deep State is prepared to fight “the last war” while the Insurgency is bringing an entirely different kind of fight....

Let’s take a look at the “fake news” meme for example. This has all the earmarks of a Deep State initiative. .... this was a Deep State response to the Communications Infrastructure fight. But it looks like this initiative has not only failed, but that the Insurgency has been able to ... to turn the entire thing around and make “fake news” its own tool. ..

.. the balance of the struggle ... will be determined by how quickly the Deep State can dispense with old and dysfunctional doctrine and innovate novel approaches...

.... the Deep State would be ill advised indeed to undertake any major efforts in the next 12–24 months....

... the Insurgency would be well advised to Blitzkrieg. Right now it has the advantage of an approach and a model that its opponent doesn’t understand and can’t react to effectively. .....

Front Three: Globalism

... if Trump clearly stood for anything, resisting the “false song of globalism” was it. ....

What is flat out astounding is the relative ease with which Trump has been able to cut through globalist Gordian Knots. For half a decade, the Trans-Pacific Partnership was an unstoppable juggernaut. Until, that is, Trump decided to end it. ....

... it is a significant victory and I am certain that it will embolden the Insurgency. At this point, I expect the Insurgency to cut deep into globalist power institutions (the World Bank, the UN, various treaty organizations) and, ... globalist-allied national institutions like the Federal Reserve. ...I see only two real moves available to the globalists. 1) economic destabilization hoping to turn “the people” against the Insurgency; 2) some kind of social/military destabilization.

But I don’t give the globalists much of a chance....

...Notably, even large multi-national corporations  ...seem to be rapidly capitulating to the Insurgency. The two major globalist forces that have not yet been publicly tested are the energy companies and the banks. What will happen here remains to be seen. ... The net-net result of this front will be a significant weakening of the post-War global institutional order and a rebalancing of power along ... nationalist alignments. ...

more at link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Wow!  Dylan's  answer to Bye Bye American Pie, is a Ballad about JFK's murder

Bob Dylan Scores First-Ever No. 1 Hit With 17-Minute ‘Murder Most Foul’ Ballad

It’s the first time the folk-rock icon has ever hit No. 1 on a Billboard chart

Bob Dylan’s latest single “Murder Most Foul,” his first original song in eight years, is also now the folk-rock icon’s first No. 1 hit on a Billboard chart.

“Murder Most Foul” is a sweeping 17-minute ballad about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963, and according to Billboard, the song debuted at No. 1 on the Rock Digital Song Sales survey.

Billboard reports that the song hit 10,000 downloads in its first week and was streamed 1.8 million times in the U.S., which landed it at #5 on Billboard’s Hot Rock Songs chart. The track also has 2.7 million views on YouTube since debuting on March 26.


You got me dizzy, Miss Lizzy
You filled me with lead
That magic bullet of yours has gone to my head
I'm just a patsy like Patsy Cline
Never shot anyone from in front or behind
I've blood in my eye, got blood in my ear
I'm never gonna make it to the new frontier
Zapruder's film I've seen that before
Seen it 33 times, maybe more
It's vile and deceitful
It's cruel and it's mean
Ugliest thing that you ever have seen
They killed him once and they killed him twice
Killed him like a human sacrifice
The day that they killed him, someone said to me, "Son
The age of the Antichrist has just only begun"
Air Force One coming in through the gate
Johnson sworn in at 2:38

Let me know when you decide to thrown in the towel
It is what it is, and it's murder most foul

... Don't worry, Mr. President
Help's on the way
Your brothers are coming, there'll be hell to pay
Brothers? What brothers? What's this about hell?
Tell them, "We're waiting, keep coming"
We'll get them as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

TRUMP is aiming to restore American Greatness - to do something other than "manage the Country's decline"

Bush philosophy was more than "we can run govt better" - It was "We can run the World better with our New World Order"

And he was wrong.  The New World order implants need removing.  Charlie Kirk has some interesting comments here.

Charlie Kirk - talking about MAGA & his new book on The Eric Metaxas Radio Show

Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, is in the studio for both hours today to talk about what he's discovered on the President Trump's campaign trail, interviewing people in the crowd, and formulating the concepts in his new book, "The MAGA Doctrine."



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...