G0ldfinger

Fitkid, do you have all your senses together? Don't fall into any blind followerships. Do your own thinking. DYODD. We all make mistakes, and we should all be humble. And, nothing is 100% guaranteed, even if certain people tell you so. Maybe 99.99%, but not 100%. The essence of this universe is that nothing is certain. The moment of decision is the present. Decision is free will, and free will is not predictable because otherwise it would not be free. In other words, existence is equivalent to decision is equivalent to free will is equivalent to randomness. So, don't give up your free will. ... and embrace uncertainty.

Are these drill holes where they looked for the tungsten?

Why would anyone care about a small currency of a lesser important (only money-shuffling) economy? GBP is irrelevant (except for some on here).

Also very interesting, although it would be good to have a source for this.

Interesting, thanks.

http://gold.approximity.com/gold-silver_watch.html

We need RH and Halcyon back*, otherwise we'll turn into a crowd of gold-blinded lemmings leaping off into the hyper-deflationist abyss (or so I believe RH would formulate it). Should this be impossible, then we could resort to inviting paid government shills who take this role instead. But it's not the same thing, especially not if they're gold-bugs in private (secretively). Does anyone have Merv's or Ben's number? If they paid me properly (Merv or Ben), I might play devil's advocate as well. I'd be good - I've heard ALL the arguments. * I'm serious.

They could issue paper certificates, then no one will ask for the actual gold! :lol:

I just try to prevent that people get this gold bull @$$-backwards.

The problem with the gold top callers is that they look at the entirely wrong charts. Show me the top: http://gold.approximity.com/since1970/Gold...rium_Price.html

Yes, I think this could happen, because some hedge fund sooner or later will try to break the shorts' back. It could be a very bumpy ride though. People like Sinclair have announced they will sell silver if gold reaches $1,220 and silver still only be in the lower $20s or below. But I don't think the big money will be able to resist the best short squeeze of the century.

Yes. $1,650 is less than 50% away from here.

The positive spin on this in the article is UNBELIEVABLE.

Here's the Gold in GBP chart in simple form. http://gold.approximity.com/since2004/Gold_GBP.html

Yes. GBPUSD might go to 1:1 anyway, so any Dollar guess becomes a Sterling guess. I don't at all think that £1,000 will be the max.

Yes. IMO that is almost a certainty over the next 10 years.

Yes, far from a bottom. First wait for the Wilsons to unload their cr@p into an already flooded market. It's gonna be quite a sight.

How can someone write cheques for +700 mortgages? Sounds retarded to me. I guess they have never heard of online banking, standing orders, or direct debit? FFS, this must be a joke, or they're really in big doodoo.

http://gold.approximity.com/gold-silver_watch.html

It wouldn't be too surprising, would it? I mean, why should they get away now, that the market has clearly turned? They should have started selling 3 years ago. Greed. Exactly. Wait and see!

The answer is that the reason for this could be the reason for which margin is increased. Those who reduce risk my reducing marging for the loans the make would possibly also seek safety in gold.

That's just nuts. At $90/oz you possibly really shouldn't buy silver anymore. Better by now at a cheap $17. Or did you even mean you wanted to wait for $900? I don't think it is impossible, but we'd be very hyper then. Anyway, don't wait for a 9, not even if it is just in 19. Better buy yesterday.

He got a kicking, but is obviously still alive.

Those who think that they are 'anti-gold bugs' and 'anti-nutters' are just nuts to assume that only war or chaos can lead to more adequate gold prices.