drbubb Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 "Homo Capensis": Coneheads, the hidden controllers of humanity ? "That's why the Vatican are wearing those mitres" ... comments from Karen Hudes, who has been revealing plenty in interviews. ( One of the first times was on Redice radio ): = Karen Hudes interview23:30minsThere's a 2nd species on this planet.They are not extraterrestrialsThey are very much with usThey made maps in the previous ice ageThe remnants of their civilisation are all over the placeA lot of time, they're along the coast, submerged... because the sea level has gone up by 400 mBut this group has large brains.They're very distinct from homo sapiensTheir DNA is so different that if the 2 species mated, their offspring would be infertileAnd we know this because their DNA was just testedThey have skulls all over the place because they had been on Earth with usBut after the ice age, there weren't that many of themAnd so they've been hiding and one of the places they have been hiding is in the VaticanThat's why the Vatican are wearing those mitresIt turns out that that's also what the high priest wore in the early beginnings of JudaismMoses was actually Akhenaten, who was a pharaohThey know this because the papyra [papyri?] that was taken from what was one of the pyramids talks about thisThe people who are doing archaeology in Israel know thisThe reason is that not only is homo ?? is trying to keep the human beings under control by divide and conquer using our money system, they have also been doing this with our religionsOrganised religionsTrying to get human beings to hate people of different religious faiths so that they will kill each other off so that the people.... manipulating human beings could .... use us like cattle.That's what's been going on through our history = Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Coneheads in Hollywood = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q8CpaejCk8 = Conceptual origins Dan Aykroyd said he developed the idea for the Coneheads based on the Moai, the mysterious and ancient stone statues of Easter Island, which have similarly conical heads, and the people of the land of Points from Harry Nilsson's The Point!. Dan Aykroyd also mentioned in an interview that he drew inspiration from the movie "This Island Earth" where the very tall foreheads of the aliens go largely unnoticed by humans. The conehead costume is highly reminiscent of the "clown blanc" costume used in French circuses for more than a century. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coneheads This Island Earth = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hR7e3StbXoU = Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 The Reality: It seems a new species has been discovered Are Paracas Elongated Skulls a New Species, Aliens or a Hoax? By Mary-Ann Russon | IB Times – Tue, Feb 11, 2014 Initial DNA analysis of one of the 3,000-year-old elongated skulls found in Paracas, Peru, has revealed that they may not have been come from humans but from a completely new species, according to Paracas Museum assistant director Brien Foerster. Foerster, who also runs his own tour group company in Peru and has authored 11 books on ancient history, told Ancient Origins that a geneticist who tested skull samples has found that they contain mutated DNA that does not match any known genetic DNA information in GenBank, an open-access sequence database of all the known genetic data in the world. The unidentified geneticist told Foerster: "It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans." "I am not sure it will even fit into the known evolutionary tree," the geneticist added. Geneticist won't come forward, for now According to Foerster, the geneticist in question, who apparently does contract work for the US government, is willing to go public, but does not want to come forward until the tests prove the theory conclusively. == > http://uk.news.yahoo.com/paracas-elongated-skulls-species-aliens-hoax-133156477.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callmejoe Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Those Egyptian conehead were reptoids. Nefertiti - a nice-looking hybrid Nefertiti's skull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Paracas Elongated Skull DNA Analysis & The Nephilim Connection Brien Foerster & L.A. Marzulli - Hour 1 - March 3, 2014 Brien Foerster is the author of more than 10 books and has appeared several times on the History Channel’s Ancient Aliens. He is also the assistant director of the Paracas History Museum in Paracas, south of Lima and runs Hidden Inca Tours, exploring ancient Peru and beyond. Lynn Marzulli is the author of Nephilim, The Unholy Deception, and The Revealing. He possesses an in-depth knowledge on the topic of UFO cults, and is a musician and composer who has recorded a number of albums. He received an honorary Doctorate degree from Pacific International University for his work on Nephilim. L.A. and Brien return to discuss the mysterious elongated Parakus skulls of Peru. We’ll hear about the skull sample test results and how the DNA mutations are unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. We are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. Brien talks about what is known of the Paracus culture, while Lynn explains why he believes the skulls are remnants of the Nephilim. In the second hour, we’ll go deeper into the Parakus culture. Is it possible they fled to North America? L.A. and Brien also discuss interesting genetic remnants of other ancient peoples. They’ll talk about how information that challenges the mainstream record is silenced and covered up while the Darwinian model rules science. Later, Marzulli shares more information on the Nephilim. > http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/03/RIR-140303.php A very interesting interview - well worth listening to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Cranial Deformation: The recent discovery of the skull (right), from Sonora, Mexico has promoted a wave of articles proclaiming it, and other similar examples to be evidence of ancient alien contact. Images of elongated skulls or 'cone-heads' can be seen as far back as Sumerian and Egyptian times, but the act of cranial deformation can be traced as even further to 45,000 years ago (1), suggesting it's importance surpassed the safety of the child even then as cranial deformation is invariably carried out on infants while the bones are supple and flexible and can be fatal in cases of excessive deformation, which raises the important question: What was it that has led so many people from so many varied cultures to incorporate this characteristic into their children.? {C} 'Cranial deformation can be defined as the product of “dynamic distortion of the normal vectors of the infantile neurocranial growth through the agency of externally applied forces' (Moss, 1958; p 275). It has been found in every continent and is not limited to humans (Shapiro, 1927; Trinkaus, 1982; Gerszten and Gerszten, 1995; Tubbs, Salter, and Oaks, 2006). (5) As noted above, the cultural preference for elongated skulls has found its way onto every continent on the earth suggesting a cultural connection of great antiquity, and therefore one of potential importance. In the earliest Sumerian Al Ubiad pottery, there is a clear association to the gods, and variations on the idea that it was a symbol of status, high rank, or wisdom have been recorded in the traditions of differing cultures around the world offering a common theme that exists in the minds of people to this day. The pertinent question with regard this phenomena is whether or not such cranial deformity dolichocephaly has ever existed naturally in humans, and if so, what is the significance of such persistent emulation through artificial deformity by so many peoples for such a long time. The Paracas Culture (c. 700 BC - 100 AD): One intriguing aspect of this culture which has been overlooked by most researchers is the fact that the nobility practiced skull binding, resulting in cranial deformation. The Paracas situation is somewhat unique in that researchers Juan Navarro and Brien Foerster have found the presence of at least 5 distinct shapes of elongated skulls, each being predominant in specific cemeteries. The largest and most striking are from a site called Chongos, near the town of Pisco, north of Paracas. These skulls are called "cone heads" by many who see them, because of their literal conical appearance. Testing of these have illustrated that, on average, the cranial capacity is 1.5 Ltr's, approximately 25% larger than contemporary skulls, and weigh as much as 60 percent more. Also, eye orbit cavities are significantly larger than contemporary skulls, and the jaws are both larger and thicker. (1) == > http://www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/cranialdeformation.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 "The pertinent question with regard this phenomena is whether or not such cranial deformity dolichocephaly has ever existed naturally in humans..." Well, maybe the question HAS been answered now: The so-called "deformation" was a product of different DNA, and was characteristic of a different species of humanoids... One with sufficient intelligence and-or power to grab powerful positions within human societies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 "... Karen Hudes is actually a key figure in financial scandals, I don't know why she's coming with this news. There are others more specialized in this field, better equipped to bring this in a professional way..." - O--, on the Proj-A. Forum Actually, Karen Hudes did NOT break this news. Others did - such as Brien Forster, who revealed the results of the DNA testing. Shiny Side Out - Interview - Brien Foerster - Paracas Skulls DNA = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwHca_xeIIA = Forster has been living and working with these skulls for a long time. He lives in Peru, and so is not so well positioned as Hudes and Dr Courtney Brown to get the word out, and reveal its significance. I am still thinking that the actual announcement on March 15th will go beyond this news about the DNA of this race. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunlee Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 And look at the shape of police helmets in Britain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranberryDog46 Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Coneheads of Atlantis was always argued that the heads were a different shape because of head binding of babies. i guess dna testing can now prove it one way or another. maybe with such large brains they would also have some form of psychic powers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 The deformation of human skulls was part of an ancient ritual practiced some 1,000 years ago in that area; it was achieved by binding a person’s head between two blocks of wood to apply pressure on the skull. “Cranial deformation has been used by different societies in the world as a ritual practice, or for distinction of status within a group or to distinguish between social groups,” said Moreno, adding, “The reason why these individuals at El Cementerio deformed their skulls is still unknown.” Many of the bones were the remains of children, which led Moreno to believe that the practice of deforming skulls “may have been inept and dangerous.” The practice of artificial skull deformation was not limited to Mexico, though. The Chinookan tribes of the U.S. Northwest and the Choctaw of the U.S. Southeast both practiced the ritual. Read more: Ancient Conehead-like Skulls Unearthed in Mexico | TIME.com http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/25/ancient-conehead-like-alien-skulls-unearthed-in-mexico/#ixzz2vfKf9zjx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Blimey! now I am a believer! msm... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2063486/Alien-skull-Peru-Mystery-giant-headed-mummy-city-Andahuaylillas.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callmejoe Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Do you need it in the msm before you'll believe it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Do you need it in the msm before you'll believe it? Quite the contrary. I was being sarcastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranberryDog46 Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 sarcasm is dificuilt to communicate without facial expression or voice tone Jake what will your position be if repeated and reputable dna testing shows the coneheads to be non human? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC1 Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 I think that the head-binding practices were an attempt to replicate the skull shape of the 'elite' caste/race of these ancient societies, whoever they were.... A bit like the practice of using skin whitening creams among non-white people today (I'm not implying that white people are in any way superior or 'elite', obviously) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 sarcasm is dificuilt to communicate without facial expression or voice tone Jake what will your position be if repeated and reputable dna testing shows the coneheads to be non human? Well I suppose I'll just have to accept it. But I feel sure that won't be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Coneheads of Atlantis was always argued that the heads were a different shape because of head binding of babies. i guess dna testing can now prove it one way or another. maybe with such large brains they would also have some form of psychic powers Have you heard the interviews with Brien Forster? The interviews say the DNA IS different - a non-human species Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 I think that the head-binding practices were an attempt to replicate the skull shape of the 'elite' caste/race of these ancient societies, whoever they were.... A bit like the practice of using skin whitening creams among non-white people today (I'm not implying that white people are in any way superior or 'elite', obviously) That's it imho. It was an attempt to copy something which they though might give them a social or financial type benefit There's no way that binding can increase the SIZE of the human skulls to match those museum pieces Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callmejoe Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 And look at the shape of police helmets in Britain. What about those bearskins that the sentries at Bucks House have on their heads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranberryDog46 Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Well I suppose I'll just have to accept it. But I feel sure that won't be the case. but what do you think the implications would be, an ancient big brained elite from Mars or Tiamat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranberryDog46 Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 Have you heard the interviews with Brien Forster? The interviews say the DNA IS different - a non-human species i've read about this but don't know how you assess the veracity of the claims Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notinformation Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 by having you own testing equipment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 but what do you think the implications would be, an ancient big brained elite from Mars or Tiamat? Implications? I'd order some nice scotch and drink it over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbubb Posted March 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2014 DNA Analysis of Paracas Elongated Skull Released – With Incredible Results Paracas is a desert peninsula located within the Pisco Province in the Ica Region, on the south coast of Peru. It is here were Peruvian archaeologist, Julio Tello, made an amazing discovery in 1928, a massive and elaborate graveyard containing tombs filled with the remains of individuals with the largest elongated skulls found anywhere in the world. These have come to be known as the ‘Paracas skulls’. In total, Tello found more than 300 of these elongated skulls, which are believed to date back around 3,000 years. A DNA analysis has now been conducted on one of the skulls and expert Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these enigmatic skulls. It is well-known that most cases of skull elongation are the result of cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding, in which the skull is intentionally deformed by applying force over a long period of time. It is usually achieved by binding the head between two pieces of wood, or binding in cloth. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular human skull. The Paracas skulls, however, are different. The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. They also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the skulls’ features are not the result of cranial deformation means that the cause of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades.Mr. Juan Navarro, owner and director of the local museum, called the Paracas History Museum, which houses a collection of 35 of the Paracas skulls, allowed the taking of samples from 5 of the skulls. The samples consisted of hair, including roots, a tooth, skull bone and skin, and this process was carefully documented via photos and video. The samples were sent to the late Lloyd Pye, founder of the Starchild Project, who delivered the samples to a geneticist in Texas for DNA testing. == > http://www.adguk-blog.com/2014/02/dna-analysis-of-paracas-elongated-skull.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.