drbubb Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 Source : http://energysavingnow.com/energytoday/environment.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Netwriter Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 http://www.springerlink.com/content/8j7145...53/fulltext.pdf Essentials of Geology - An Introduction of Planet Earth by Stephen Marshak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
id5 Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 http://www.springerlink.com/content/8j7145...53/fulltext.pdf Essentials of Geology - An Introduction of Planet Earth by Stephen Marshak Steve, you do realise that denying global warming will soon be akin to denying the Holocaust. You will be denying that the UK is coming out of recession next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Netwriter Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 I think the first chart clearly shows that there has been a temperature rise in the past 100 years (mainly at the beginning of the century). Admittedly not historically the biggest according to that study. This one shows a rise in CO2 since 2002, coincident with a fall in temperature from that recent peak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Netwriter Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Maybe this one is worth including. It shows the official charts created in 1999 and 2008. The thing to look at is the change in the plot from 1999 and before. For some reason the 2008 chart appears to show a rise which the 1999 chart did not. So the change in methodology has resulted in a different result. Curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Netwriter Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 450 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming This huge list is here: http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/p...supporting.html I've just checked a couple. This one caught my eye: A 2000-year global temperature reconstruction based on non-treering proxies http://www.freesundayschoollessons.org/pdf...ate-history.pdf which has these 4 charts: Compare those charts with official IPCC charts. First what the IPCC is using for the past 1000 years: and from: http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/figspm-1.htm and then the IPCC projection based on those: from: IPCC Slides http://www.grida.no/CLIMATE/IPCC_TAR/slides/index.htm This is the biggest so called scientific disgrace in history. I think jail is too good for those responsible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purechatterbox Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 First what the IPCC is using for the past 1000 years: and from: http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/figspm-1.htm and then the IPCC projection based on those: from: IPCC Slides http://www.grida.no/CLIMATE/IPCC_TAR/slides/index.htm This is the biggest so called scientific disgrace in history. I think jail is too good for those responsible. These are absolutely nervewrecking! I can't believe some of those spikes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.