DOUBLE POST (from 'my' thread):
A great example of an intelligent person making a silly mistake.
As someone else said: it's not that it has to be proven that gold is money. Anyone who claims anything else has to prove it (against over 6,000 years of human history). Such an endeavour therefore seems rather in vain to me.
Secondly, to say that gold as money doesn't work citing certain historical references is as if one would say that eating healthy doesn't improve health, while not mentioning that the considered group of people are heavy smokers. The point is, even during the "gold standard" times, banks were always running fractional reserve banking. Of course, this doesn't work and it has to collapse periodically. So, the "historical" reference to a gold standard quoted by Halcyon is possibly pretty useless.
EDIT: During war times politicians were also always happy to abandon the "gold standard" for a while. Politics and "gold standard" never really like each other. Printing limitless is what politicians really want.